Mete Feridun Cyprus International University
Reference: Received 05th October 2005; Published 26th December 2005. ISSN 15791475
Este Working Paper se encuentra recogido en DOAJ  Directory of Open Access Journals http://www.doaj.org/
Resumen
 El presente estudio analiza la crisis financiera argentina de 2001 a través del estudio del impacto del gasto militar en la deuda exterior argentina. Para ello, aplicamos el test de causalidad de Granger a los datos anuales recopilados entre 1971 y 2002. Los resultados obtenidos demostraron que el gasto militar no influyó en la evolución de la deuda en Argentina. Los resultados del test de causalidad de Granger muestran que las hipótesis nulas del gasto militar no son causa Granger y que no se rechaza la deuda exterior. Los resultados no muestran tampoco una causalidad a la inversa. Este resultado invalida la hipótesis de que el gasto militar pueda ser importante para determinar la evolución de la deuda en países en vías de desarrollo.
Abstract

This study analyzes the Argentinean Financial Crisis of 2001 through investigating the impact of military expenditure on external debt in Argentina. For this purpose, Grangercausality testing procedure is applied on yearly data between 1971 and 2002. Strong evidence emerged that military burden had no impact on the evolution of debt in Argentina: Results of Grangercausality test show that the null hypotheses of military expenditure does not granger cause external debt is not rejected. Results show no evidence of reverse causality either. This finding invalidates the hypothesis that military burden may be important in determining the evolution of debt in developing countries. 
1. INTRODUCTION
As discussed in Feridun (2004), following the IMF´s guidance, Argentina cut tariffs on imports, privatized its state enterprises, reduced social service expenditure, and welcomed multinational corporations in 1980s. Problems began in 1990s when policy makers decided to implement a fixed exchange rate linking its peso to the dollar at a rate of one to one. As a result, when US dollar became overvalued, the peso became overvalued as well, making exports expensive and imports cheap. This, in turn, increased Argentina´s trade deficit, interest rates, level of unemployment and diminished its national production. Hence, Argentina winded up with no choice but to borrow more and more from the IMF in order to maintain a large reserve of dollars to sustain an overvalued currency. A thorough analysis of the Argentinaan economy prior to the recent financial crisis by Eichengreen (2002) reveals that Argentina had suffered extended periods of economic stagnation and high levels of inflation prior to its financial crisis episodes. Then, it pegged their exchange rates as an attempt to stabilize its ailing economy and to bring down inflation. Argentinaan policy makers chose to implement an inflexible peg by adopting dollarbased currency board. Further analysis by Eichengreen (2002) reveals that following extended periods of economic instability, Argentina managed to bring inflation down in the context of the exchange rate based stabilization policy. Then, it experienced a poststabilization boom as the reduction in the interest rates toward global levels stimulated the domestic demand, especially for durable and semidurable consumption goods and private investment. In addition, volume of exports increased as the economy reached stable levels. However, export growth reached was highly insufficient to finance the buoyant import demands.
This rendered the country dependent on capital inflows. As a result, the country made intensive efforts to balance the publicsector accounts and pursued ambitious programs to privatize the public enterprises. Furthermore, it took steps to strengthen the banking system. However, when crisis hit the country in 2001, the fiscal consolidation movement was incomplete and as Eichengreen (2002) points out, the political support for cuts in public spending was highly fragile and fragmented. In Argentina, political disturbance jeopardized the fiscal and economic adjustment attempts and the trigger of the crisis was the breakdown of support for the fiscal cuts demanded by the Economy Minister Jose Luis Machinea and his politically successor, Roberto LopezMurphy. The crisis required the immediate assistance of the IMF, which initially rejected a $1.3 billioncredit demand by Argentina and allowed its financial crisis to deepen. IMF finally provided credit to Argentina only after it became completely unable to maintain its peg to the dollar due to the devaluation of the Brazilian Real.
Dunne et al. (2004) explains that the relationship between military expenditures and external debt can be of two forms. As a budget item, military expenditure creates the need for funding. If a rise in military expenditure cannot be financed through taxation, creates a deficit which may be financed in four different ways: printing money, using foreign exchange reserves, borrowing abroad or borrowing domestically. However, each of these methods has some limits and implications, which are widely discussed in the literature and, while interrelated, are associated with particular macroeconomic imbalances: printing money with inflation; using foreign reserves with the onset of exchange crises; foreign borrowing with an external debt crisis (Fischer and Easterly, 1990). High public sector deficits relative to GDP, therefore, potentially create a need for foreign borrowing and external debt accumulation, particularly when the means to finance deficits domestically is limited. Hence, there is likely to be a relatively close relation between the deficits and foreign borrowing in developing countries, where the ability of using tax revenues to finance public expenditures is likely to be limited, money creation is likely to have already been misused, financial markets are relatively thin and domestic borrowing possibilities are relatively restricted (Dunne et al. 2004). A component of military spending will be allocated to pay for arms imports, which will create the need for foreign exchange. If the economy lacks foreign exchange, it will need to obtain it from external sources, usually by borrowing. It is also possible that depreciations in the currency could lead to increases in foreign exchange requirements from those expected over the life of a project.4 In the 1970s, external borrowing was often a preferred means of financing balance of payments deficits for South American countries. Furthermore, far from using up foreign reserves to pay for overseas purchases, Argentina saw its reserves increase over the second half of the 1970s, at the same time she was building up her debt (Dunne et al. 2004).
The key question in analyzing the effect of military expenditure on debt then, is how such expenditure is financed. If it is through higher tax revenues or lower government spending in other areas, it will not create a deficit; if higher military spending does create a deficit, this may or may not be financed through external debt. In the case of arms imports, the question is whether they can be funded through export earnings or existing reserves, or whether they require new credit (Dunne et al. 2004). Figure 1 below shows the military spending and arms imports of Argentina at constant prices. As the figure indicates, military expenditure falls gradually up to the mid1980s, and then rises thereafter. Somewhat surprisingly, the turning point coincides roughly with the restoration of democracy in 1984. The debt crisis that struck Argentina followed a typical pattern. The country borrowed heavily during conditions of easy international credit and relatively strong domestic economies. Then a change for the worse in both domestic and especially international circumstances led to a situation in which the most debtor countries including Argentina could not service their debts, leading to loss of international creditworthiness, severe recession, and crippling debt service payments, even when restructuring agreements were reached. One potentially important contributor to the growth of external debt was military spending and the focus of this study is to evaluate empirically the effect of military spending on debt in Argentina.
This article is structured as follows. Section II reviews the literature on the impact of military spending on developing country debt. Section III presents the data and introduces the methodology followed. The last section points out the conclusions that emerge from the study.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
There exists a poor literature covering the impact of military spending on developing country debt. Brzoska (1983) Looney (1987, 1989, 1998), Dunne et al. (2004) have attempted to investigate the potential effect of military spending on developing country debt, and have provided some useful initial findings, but point to the need to understand better the dynamics within the individual countries. The results present a very mixed picture, though most studies do tend to show an insignificant or negative impact (Dunne, 1996). Analysis of the effect of military expenditure on external debt is, however, more limited. Some authors, starting with Brzoska (1983), have pointed to military expenditure as being an important variable in explaining the rise of foreign debt in a number of developing countries, suggesting that this has led to reduced economic growth. Looney and Frederiksen (1986) follow Brzoska (1983) in suggesting that the impact of high external borrowing due to defence on a country´s overall growth performance and resource allocation depends on the country´s capacity for international borrowing. Looney (1989) and Looney and Frederiksen (1986) allocate developing countries to these groups based on their capability to raise external debt, using factor analysis and discriminant analysis.
They suggest that unconstrained countries will be able to support higher level of arms imports. Looney (1989, 1998) then drew attention to the weakness of the literature on the motives of debt accumulation and indicated the significance of military expenditures, specifically arms imports, for the Third World indebtedness. In his empirical analysis Looney (1989), developed three models, for ME, PDB (Public External Debt), AI (Arms Import) and ran regressions for whole sample, resourceconstrained countries and resourceunconstrained countries, using twostage least squares. In a more recent contribution Sezgin (2004) considered the relation between military debt and arms imports in Turkey. As direct data are not available on cash payments for arms imports and military debt, he resorted to an indirect analysis and considered the likely impact of defence on external indebtedness via a model of debt and arms imports (in fact arms transfers to Turkey). To do this, he estimated a model where the growth of external debt was a function of the growth of real GNP, the growth of merchandise imports, the growth of merchandise exports, the growth of real defence expenditures, the growth of real defence equipment expenditures and the growth of real arms imports. He found arms imports to be the only significant defence related variable, although it was not strongly significant. Dunne et al. (2004) use panel data techniques to explore the effect of military expenditure on debt on a sample of industrializing economies around the world between 1960 and 2000.
Their model estimates the share of external debt in GDP as a function of GDP growth, exports as a share of GDP, international reserves as a share of GDP, and military expenditure as a share of GDP (military burden). GDP growth, exports and reserves are included as they may measure the ability of the economy to finance military expenditure and arms imports without resorting to borrowing. In a static panel data model, they find military burden to have a positive but insignificant effect on the debt burden, while GDP growth and reserves have a significant negative effect, and exports a significant positive effect. However, when a dynamic panel data model was created and estimated, using the ArellanoBond (1991) GMM estimators, a significant positive effect of military burden was found. GDP growth is still significant and negative, indicating that a strong economy makes it easier to manage debt, while the export and reserve variables become insignificant. The lagged dependant variable is very strongly significant and positive.
3. DATA METHODOLOGY
This study analyzes the Argentina financial crisis of 2001 through investigating the impact of military expenditure on external debt in Argentina. For this purpose, Grangercausality testing procedure is applied on yearly data between 1971 and 2002. The military expenditure series, denotes as MEXP were obtained from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), and from the IMF´s Government Financial Statistics. External debt figures are obtained from World Development Indicators CDROM. In order to deal with the question of how to compare nominal values of debt and military expenditures across time, they are taken as shares of GDP, and were transformed into logarithmic returns in order to achieve meanreverting relationships, and to make econometric testing procedures valid. GDP per capita, denoted by GDP, is calculated as gross domestic product divided by midyear population. Table 1 presents the descriptive statistics of the logarithmic transformations of time series data. The measures of skewness and kurtosis as well as the probabilities of the JarqueBerra test statistic provide evidence in favor of the null hypothesis of a normal distribution for all data sets.
III.I. ADF Unit Root Tests
The first necessary condition to perform Grangercausality tests is to study the stationary of the time series under consideration and to establish the order of integration present. The Augmented DickeyFuller (ADF) (1979) unit root test is used in examining the stationarity of the data series. It consists of running a regression of the first difference of the series against the series lagged once, lagged difference terms, and optionally, a constant and a time trend. This can be expressed as:
The test for a unit root is conducted on the coefficient of yt1 in the regression. If the coefficient is significantly different from zero then the hypothesis that y contains a unit root is rejected. Rejection of the null hypothesis implies stationarity. If the calculated ADF statistic is higher than McKinnon´s critical value then the null hypothesis is not rejected and it is concluded that the considered variable is nonstationary, i.e. has at least one unit root. Then, the procedures are reapplied after transforming the series into first differenced form. If the null hypothesis of nonstationarity can be rejected, it can be concluded that the time series is integrated of order one, I(1).
Table 4 summarizes the results of the ADF unit root tests on levels and in first differences of the data. Strong evidence emerges that all the time series are I(1).
III.II. Cointegration Tests
Next, we perform cointegration analysis. Cointegration analysis helps to identify longrun economic relationships between two or several variables and to avoid the risk of spurious regression. Cointegration analysis is important because if two nonstationary variables are cointegrated, a VAR model in the first difference is misspecified due to the effect of a common tend. If cointegration relationship is identified, the model should include residuals from the vectors (lagged one period) in the dynamic Vector Error Correcting Mechanism (VECM) system. In this stage, Johansen cointegration test is used to identify cointegrating relationship among the variables. Within the Johansen multivariate cointegrating framework, the following system is estimated:
Where is the first difference operator, z denotes vector of variables, is a drift parameter, and II is a (p x p) matrix of the form both (p x r) matrices of full rank, with containing the r cointegrating relationships and carrying the corresponding adjustment coefficients in each of the r vectors. The Johansen approach can be used to carry out Granger causality tests as well. In the Johansen framework the first step is the estimation of an unrestricted, closed pth order VAR in k variables. Johansen (1995) suggests two tests statistics to determine the cointegration rank. The first of these is known as the trace statistic
where depending upon the stage in the sequence. This is the relevant test statistic for the null hypothesis against the alternative The second test statistic is the maximum eigenvalue test known as we denote it as (r0). This is closely related to the trace statistic but arises from changing the alternative hypothesis from . The idea is to try and improve the power of the test by limiting the alternative to a cointegration rank which is just one more than under the null hypothesis. The test statistic is:
The null hypothesis is there are r cointegrating vectors, against the alternative of r + 1 cointegrating vectors. Johansen and Juselius (1990) indicated that the trace test might lack the power relative to the maximum eigenvalue test. Based on the power of the test, the maximum eigenvalue test statistic is often preferred. Table 6 presents results from the Johansen cointegration test among the data sets. Neither maximum eigenvalue nor trace tests rejects the null hypothesis of no cointegration at the 5% level.
III.III. GrangerCausality Test
According to Granger (1969), Y is said to "Grangercause" X if and only if X is better predicted by using the past values of Y than by not doing so with the past values of X being used in either case. In short, if a scalar Y can help to forecast another scalar X, then we say that Y Grangercauses X. If Y causes X and X does not cause Y, it is said that unidirectional causality exists from Y to X. If Y does not cause X and X does not cause Y, then X and Y are statistically independent. If Y causes X and X causes Y, it is said that feedback exists between X and Y. Essentially, Granger´s definition of causality is framed in terms of predictability.
Granger (1969) originally suggested the Granger test, which was improved by Sargent (1976). To implement the Granger test, we assume a particular autoregressive lag length k (or p) and estimate Equation (5) and (6) by OLS:
F test is carried out for the null hypothesis of no Granger causality where F statistic is the Wald statistic for the null hypothesis. If the F statistic is greater than a certain critical value for an F distribution, then we reject the null hypothesis that Y does not Grangercause X (equation (1)), which means Y Grangercauses X.
A time series with stable mean value and standard deviation is called a stationary series. If d differences have to be made to produce a stationary process, then it can be defined as integrated of order d. Granger (1983) proposed the concept of cointegration, and Engle and Granger (1987) made further analysis. If several variables are all I(d) series, their linear combination may be cointegrated, that is, their linear combination may be stationary. Although the variables may drift away from equilibrium for a while, economic forces may be expected to act so as to restore equilibrium, thus, they tend to move together in the long run irrespective of short run dynamics. The definition of the Granger causality is based on the hypothesis that X and Y are stationary or I(0) time series. Therefore, we can not apply the fundamental Granger method for variables of I(1).
The classical approach to deal with integrated variables is to difference them to make them stationary. Hassapis et al. (1999) show that in the absence of cointegration, the direction of causality can be decided upon via standard Ftests in the first differenced VAR. the VAR in the first difference can be written as:
Since, maximum eigenvalue and trace tests do not reject the null hypothesis of no cointegration at the 5% level, aforementioned VAR method can be used. Table 6 shows the results of these regressions.
.
Results of Grangercausality test show that the null hypotheses of military expenditure does not granger cause external debt is not rejected. Results show no evidence of reverse causality either.
4. CONCLUSIONS
The debt crisis that struck Argentina followed a typical pattern. The country borrowed heavily during conditions of easy international credit and relatively strong domestic economies. Then a change for the worse in both domestic and especially international circumstances led to a situation in which the most debtor countries including Argentina could not service their debts, leading to loss of international creditworthiness, severe recession, and crippling debt service payments, even when restructuring agreements were reached. One potentially important contributor to the growth of external debt was military spending and the focus of this study was to evaluate empirically the effect of military spending on debt in Argentina. Strong evidence emerged that military burden had no impact on the evolution of debt in Argentina. This finding invalidates the hypothesis that military burden may be important in determining debt in countries. Results of this study also contradict with Dunne et al. (2004), where a panel data study of many countries was able to draw meaningful conclusions.
References
Arellano, M. and Bond, S. (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data models: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies 58(2), 277297.
Ball, N. (1984) Third World Security Expenditure: A Statistical Compendium, FOA Report, Stockholm.
Branford, S. and Kucinski, B. (1988) The Debt Squads. London/New Jersey: Zed Books.
Brzoska, M. (1983) Research communication: the military related external debt of third world countries. Journal of Peace Research 20(3), 271277.
Dickey, D.A. and Fuller W.A. 1979. Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74: 427431.
Dunne, P. (1996) Economic effects of military spending in LDCs: A survey, Chapter 23 in The Peace Dividend, Contributions to Economic Analysis Series, edited by N. P. Gleditsch, A. Cappelen, O. Bjerkholt, R. Smith and P. Dunne, NorthHolland, 13, 439464.
Dunne, P. J., PerloFreeman, S. and Soydan, A. (2004) "Military Expenditure and Debt in South America" Defence and Peace Economics, Vol. 15(2), April, pp. 173187
Eichengreen, B. 2002. "Financial Crises and What to Do About Them." Oxford University Press
Engle, Robert F., and Clive W. J. Granger. (1987). CoIntegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation and Testing. Econometrica. Vol. 55, pp. 251276.
Feridun, Mete. (2004), "Determinants of the Argentinaan Financial Crisis: Can We Predict Future Crises?", Lahore Journal of Economics, Vol. 9, No. 2
Fischer, S. and Easterly, W. (1990) The economics of the government budget constraint. The World Bank Research Observer 5(2), 127142.
Fry, M. J. (1997) Emancipating the Banking System and Developing Markets for Government Debt. London, New York: Routledge.
Granger, C.W.J. (1969) "Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and CrossSpectral Methods," Econometrica, 37: 2436.
Granger, Clive W. J. (1983). CoIntegrated Variables and ErrorCorrecting Models. University of California, San Diego, Discussion Paper. 198313.
Hassapis, C., N. Pittis and K. Prodromidis, 1999. Unit roots and Granger causality in the EMS interest rates: the German dominance hypothesis revisited. J. Intl Money Finance, 18: 4773
Johansen, Søren. (1995). LikelihoodBased Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Johansen, S. and E. Schaumburg (1999) "Likelihood Analysis of Seasonal Integration," Journal of Econometrics, 88: 301339.
Labán, R. M. and Larraín, F. B. (1998) The return of private capital to Argentina in the 1990s: Causes, effects, and policy reactions. Harvard Institute for International Development, Development Discussion Papers, no. 627, March 1998.
Looney, R. E. (1987) Impact of military expenditure on Third World debt. Canadian Journal of Economics 8(1), 726.
Looney, R. E. (1989) The influence of arms imports on Third World debt. Journal of Developing Areas 23(2), 221231.
Looney, R. E. (1998) Foreign capital flows and defense expenditures: Patterns of causation and constraint in Pakistan. Canadian Journal of Development Studies 19(1), 117132.
Looney, R. E. and Frederiksen, P. C. (1986) Defence expenditure, external public debt and growth in developing countries. Journal of Peace Research 23(4), 329338.
Perry, G. and Servén, L. (2002) The anatomy of a multiple crisis: Why was Argentina special and what can we learn from it. Paper prepared for National Bureau of Economic Research Project on Exchange Rate Crises in Emerging Markets, Session on Argentina, 17 July.
Sargent, Thomas J. (1976) ´A Classic Macroeconometric Model for the United States´, Journal of Political Economy 84: 207237.
Scheetz, T. S. (1996) The ´peace dividend´ in Argentina and Argentina: An evaluation of opportunities for defense conversion. Paper commissioned by Bonn International Centre for Conversion for its Conversion Survey, mimeo. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, Argentina.
Scheetz, T. S., unpublished data series, mimeo Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, Argentina.
Sezgin, S. (2004) An empirical note on external debt and defence expenditures in Turkey. Defence and Peace. Economics 14(2), (this issue).
Stiglitz, J. E. (2002) Globalization and Its Discontents. W. W. Norton and Company.
Theberge, A. (1999) The Latin American debt crisis and its historical precursors. Seminar paper, Columbia State. University, available at URL http://www.columbia.edu/~ad245/theberge.pdf.
Vásquez, I. (1996) The Brady Plan and marketbased solutions to debt crises. The Cato Journal, 16(2), Fall 1996.
About the AuthorAutor: Mete Feridun Dirección: Lecturer in Finance and Economics. Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences. Cyprus International University. Nicosia, Cyprus Correo electrónico: mete.feridun@lycos.com

DOCUMENTOS DE TRABAJO EN ANÁLISIS ECONÓMICO (EAWP) Derechos reservados 2002. El permiso para reproducir algún artículo está garantizado si Documentos de Trabajo en Análisis Económico lo acredita, las copias no son vendidas y es en acto de mayor difusión del documento.
Editor: Fernando GonzálezLaxe. (Universidade da Coruña) Director: Vennacio Salcines. (Universidade da Coruña) Subdirector: Andrés Blancas. Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas (UNAM) Editor Asociado para America Latina: Luis Miguel Galindo. Facultad de Ecomomía (UNAM) 